fluent aphasia

But no difference between left hemisphere damage fluent aphasia group left hemisphere damage non-aphasia group and right hemisphere damage group ( P> 0.05);

而左脑损害流利性失语亚组、左脑损害非失语亚组与右脑损害组两两比较无差别（P＞0.05）；

The false tone expression of left hemisphere damage non-fluent aphasia group was more frequent than that of left hemisphere damage fluent aphasia group, left hemisphere damage non-aphasia group or right hemisphere damage group ( P0. 05);

左脑损害非流利性失语亚组的声调错误较左脑损害流利性失语亚组、左脑损害非失语亚组或右脑损害组多（P＜0.05）；

Semantic dementia and fluent primary progressive aphasia: two sides of the same coin?

词义性痴呆和流利的原发性进行性失语: 同一硬币的两面?

The recovery of non-fluent aphasia in the patients of treatment group indicated significant difference comparing with control group ( P < 0.05). The recovery of the akinetic mutism revealed more significant difference ( P < ( 0.01).)

治疗组中非流利性失语语言恢复人数较对照组差异有显著意义（P<0.05），运动不能性缄默症消失人数差异有非常显著意义（P<0.01）。